Opioid Use Disorder: The Debate Over Permanent Federal Guidelines
Making federal guidelines for treatment of people with opioid use disorder that were crafted in response to the pandemic permanent will have both upsides and downsides, though mostly up.
Imagine facing the challenge of opioid addiction in the midst of a pandemic. That's what many have been up against, and federal guidelines were put in place to help manage this crisis. But now, there's a debate about whether these temporary measures should become permanent. In this episode, Elizabeth Tracey talks with Eric Strain, a leading expert on substance use disorders at Johns Hopkins Medicine, about the pros and cons of this significant decision.
Strain highlights how these guidelines have made it easier for people to access treatment, but he also points out potential downsides. One concern is that making these guidelines permanent might limit the use of contingency management, an effective treatment strategy that relies on setting up rewards for positive behavior changes. This approach has shown success in various fields, yet its future could be at risk.
Strain weighs the benefits and challenges, providing a balanced view on how these regulations could shape the future of opioid addiction treatment. If you're curious about the intricacies of managing opioid use disorder and the impact of federal policies, this episode offers valuable insights.