Challenging COVID-19 Science with Trish Wood and Regina Watteel
Episode Overview
Examines the credibility of COVID-19 data used for mandates. Discusses Tony Fauci's recent congressional testimony. Questions public health decisions based on controversial studies. Highlights potential harm from pandemic policies. Explores broader implications for society and government actions.
It's the onus of proof on those trying to force masks on everybody to show that this is an effective measure
In this episode of 'Trish Wood is Critical', Trish dives into the controversial topic of COVID-19 policies and the science behind them. Featuring Regina Watteel, a statistician and author of 'Fisman’s Fraud', the discussion centres on the credibility of data used to justify pandemic mandates. Watteel scrutinises a specific study that supported these mandates, arguing it should never have seen the light of day.
The episode also touches on Tony Fauci's recent congressional testimony, where his statements are put under the microscope for their scientific validity. Trish and Regina unpack how bad science may have influenced public health decisions, leading to potentially harmful outcomes. They also explore the broader implications of these policies, questioning why certain measures were enforced despite contradictory data. If you've ever wondered about the integrity of the science that shaped our world during the pandemic, this episode is a must-listen.
Trish's engaging style and Regina's expertise make for a compelling conversation that challenges conventional narratives. Don't miss out on this thought-provoking discussion that will leave you questioning what you thought you knew about COVID-19 science.