Cracking the Code of Academic Authorship: Prof. Richard Pates Shares His Wisdom
Episode Overview
Authorship decisions and the significance of substantial contributions
Ethical practices and transparency in recognizing all contributors' efforts
Importance of early determination of authorship to avoid conflicts
Practical guidance for early career researchers and professionals in addiction science
Insights from Professor Richard Pates, Editor-in-Chief of Substance Use journal
Anyone who's made a significant contribution to the work that's being reported should be an author. It's a question of ethics, being honest, and presenting peer-reviewed papers which are worth publishing. - Prof. Richard Pates
Ever scratched your head over who gets credit on a research paper? In this episode of 'Addictions Edited', Dr. Casey Calver sits down with Professor Richard Pates, the Editor-in-Chief of the journal Substance Use and a board member of ISAJE. Richard opens up about the often murky waters of authorship decisions in academic publishing. He shares stories from his early days as a researcher and how those experiences shaped his approach to determining who gets their name on a paper.
You'll hear about the significance of making a genuine contribution, rather than just holding a certain position or being someone's spouse. Richard also stresses the importance of discussing authorship roles early in the writing process to avoid conflicts later on. This episode is packed with practical advice for early career researchers and seasoned professionals alike, emphasizing ethical practices and transparency. Whether you're navigating your first publication or mentoring others, Richard's insights are invaluable.