Abstaining or Moderating: Finding Your Path to Breaking Bad Habits
The main point I would say is that it's easier to be an abstainer. Now, of course, that's something an abstainer would say.
Ever wondered whether it's better to cut out bad habits entirely or just tone them down? Avery Harper tackles this very question in an eye-opening episode of 'Strategic AF'. Avery dives into the two main strategies people use to manage their vices: abstaining and moderating. She breaks down the pros and cons of each approach, helping you figure out which might work best for you. For those who prefer a clear-cut method, abstaining offers a straightforward, all-or-nothing approach.
It’s like flipping a switch—either you do it, or you don’t. But this method isn’t without its challenges. Abstainers often need to set strict rules and constantly test their willpower, making it a bit of a mental marathon. On the flip side, moderators take a more flexible route, allowing themselves to indulge in small doses. This can be easier on the psyche but comes with its own set of hurdles.
The need to make frequent decisions about when and how much to indulge can lead to decision fatigue and weakened resolve over time. Avery doesn’t just leave you hanging with the theory; she dives into practical tips for identifying which camp you might fall into. Are you someone who finds it easier to say no completely, or do you prefer to allow yourself some leeway?
She also touches on the role of cravings and denial in both approaches, offering valuable insights into how these factors can affect your success. Whether you're battling a sweet tooth, trying to cut back on screen time, or looking to moderate your drinking, this episode offers a wealth of information to help you make an informed choice. Tune in to 'Strategic AF' and let Avery guide you through the maze of bad habits with her thoughtful analysis and practical advice.