Nadia Sawalha & Mark Adderley
Nadia Sawalha & Mark Adderley
40: Would NADIA & MARK Be TOGETHER if They HADN'T (or COULDN'T) Have KIDS?
40: Would NADIA & MARK Be TOGETHER if They HADN'T (or COULDN'T) Have KIDS?
40: Would NADIA & MARK Be TOGETHER if They HADN'T (or COULDN'T) Have KIDS?
Wednesday 19th June 2019
Nadia Sawalha and Mark Adderley discuss how children have shaped their marriage and if they'd still be together without them on 'How to Stay Married (So Far)'.
23 minutes
Inspiring
Empowering
Informative
Hopeful
Engaging
About this podcast
Author:
Nadia Sawalha & Mark Adderley
Overview:
Categories:
Navigating Intimate Relationships
Healing Relationships
Relationships & Community
Sobriety in Everyday Life
Mindfulness & Emotional Wellbeing
Links:
Visit site
Episodes:
134 (View all)
Do you want to link to this podcast?
Get the buttons here!Nadia & Mark: Would We Be Together Without Kids?
I remember thinking to myself: I didn't think to myself: is this a deal breaker? Me having two children already in a different way really did make me want to have a family with someone, because I felt I'd dropped the ball, I felt I'd not done things properly.
Ever wondered how kids shape a marriage? Nadia Sawalha and Mark Adderley dive into this very question in their podcast 'How to Stay Married (So Far)'. This episode sees the couple openly discuss their differing views on having children. While Nadia felt a societal and personal push towards motherhood, Mark was content with their life as a duo.
They also chat about how their careers influenced their decision to start a family and stress the importance of communication in navigating parenthood together. The heart of the episode is a tough question: would they still be together if they hadn't or couldn't have kids? Their candid conversation offers a deep look into their relationship's resilience and the choices they've made along the way.
Whether you're a parent or contemplating becoming one, this episode provides a heartfelt and honest look at the complexities of balancing personal desires and partnership.